Advertisement

Sign up for our daily newsletter

Advertisement

Olympus 50 200mm weight loss: Olympus Zuiko DIGITAL ED 50-200mm f/2.8-3.5 ED Lens

It is extremely well built. The maximum rate in this mode is 6.

Matthew Cox
Friday, July 30, 2021
Advertisement
  • I and mm f 2.

  • There is no provision for attaching a strap to the lens shoe. In terms of real-world image quality, it is not really necessary to remove the EC for shooting at mm and lower focal lengths, unless the very best image quality is necessary.

  • Chi Pham's gear list: Chi Pham's gear list.

  • As far as the indoors test with manual focusing is concerned, the most likely conclusion is that accurate focusing is the main weakness in these conditions. The SWD version has been repeatedly praised in reviews for its excellent image quality and build quality.

  • That said, though, compared to other manufacturers lenses that are as fast and cover this range, it's a real lighweight! A very slight image degradation is visible at mm effective focal length.

Shop by category

For instance, it would allow the to remain hanging from the photographer's olympuus while temporarily switching to a shorter lens, without forcing dietitian weight loss surgery photographer to stow away the in a backpack. New posts. The color rendition is very good in my subjective opinion, and I saw no significant flare even in high-contrast, back-lit situations where direct sunlight hits the front element of the lens. Provided by clustrmaps.

Focusing was manual at maximum magnification on the LCD screen while using olympus 50 200mm weight loss peaking, to eliminate any imprecisions caused by AF. The SWD version has been repeatedly praised in reviews for its excellent image quality and build quality. Several posts on bulletin boards report conflicting opinions on the AF performance of the E-M1 with the There is no provision for attaching a strap to the lens shoe. Be warned, though, this is a BIG, somewhat heavy lens and does its best on a good tripod.

I'll be waiting 200mm weight loss long time on a Mark II; just my opinion but I think the price is artificially high. Copyright c Enrico Savazzi. Lighter too. This AF mode is quite often successful, but in this case the biggest risk is that movements of the subject or handheld camera may shift the subject out of the active AF area. Most likely, this also true of the E-M10 and all "lower" Olympus camera models.

Olympus 50-200mm f/2.8-3.5 Zuiko Digital User Reviews

Wfight may also add aberrations of their own, as well as flare and loss of contrast. It contains 6 optical elements in 5 groups, adds 22 mm to the length of a lens and weighs g. Olympus EC It isn't in exactly the same category as the mm, but if you were willing to compromise on the focal length and aperture differences, it would probably end up being an excellent choice. Write your own user review for this lens!

It's worth noting that the zoom ring doesn't cover the focal range in a linear liss there's a lot of travel between 50mm and 70mm, over an inch of ring movement, but the distance between major focal lengths decreases rapidly as you go higher. The general conclusions of these reviews are that image resolution and contrast remain very good in the image center at all focal lengths. This lens was one of the reasons for me to go back to Olympus after having switched to Pentax last year. The baffle in this teleconverter prevents this problem. I can only make a qualitative comparison based on my experience with both lenses.

Reply Reply with quote Reply to thread Complain. In this case, I decided to compare the following lenses and settings:. Although a lot of people only upload weigth to Instagram from their smartphones, the app is much more than just a mobile photography platform. For the "VFA" target the viewfinder accuracy target from Imaging Resourcewe also provide sample crops from the center and upper-left corner of each shot, so you can quickly get a sense of relative sharpness, without having to download and inspect the full-res images.

Other articles you might find interesting...

I am more interested in a lens in the 1 kg class, that I can carry olym;us a whole day in an ordinary olympus 50 200mm weight loss backpack and does not exceed the meager carry-on limits on intercontinental flights. How well this works in practice is discussed below. You do pay a bit for the quality you're getting, and there isn't much else to fill the range of focal lengths this lens offers, but if you're partial to the Olympus lineup, you won't regret having this lens being a part of your arsenal.

The distance scale indicates the distance both in AF o,ympus manual focus. Excellent resolution wide open at all focal lengths, excellent build quality, SIZE, etc etc. It is extremely well built. The results may be affected by slight focusing differences. It's got some big shoes to fill, so check out how it fares in our review.

Other than that? Bursts in slow mode, on the other hand, keep AF working between shots, and have a better chance of success. Best cameras and lenses. On the E-M1. It left a huge hole in my pouch. On the other hand, a teleconverter may enlarge the image circle of the lens beyond its original diameter, and cause light to spill onto other parts of the camera interior, potentially causing reflections, flare and loss of contrast. It is larger and havier that younger lightweight and cheaper brother - ZD 3.

Got some great shots at an air display recently. As far as the indoors test with manual focusing is concerned, the most likely conclusion is that accurate focusing is the main weakness in these conditions. I can only make a qualitative comparison based on my experience with both lenses. To avoid space limitations with the layout of our review pages, indexes to the test shots launch in separate windows. Single AF is not for me.

4/3 to Micro 4/3 adapter

The E-M1 reports this teleconverter as an accessory, and its firmware as version 1. Better still, you should program the combination that works best for you into one of the Mysets. How well this works in practice is discussed below. Read more reviews ». The E-M1 is one of the most highly configurable cameras available today, and several other settings affect AF performance.

I olympus 50 200mm weight loss zoom with my legs through the 10 mm gap of focal lengths between the two lenses. Well packaged. M43 flexibility for Macro photography with Oly 60mm F2. Reply Reply with quote Reply to thread Complain. The mm does hunt a little on the E-M1 if the background is busy or bright. II of the mm f 2.

Olympus 50 200mm weight loss metering automatically compensates for this. The best reason for using one of these zooms is when weight must be kept to a minimum, and the choice is between a picture that clearly shows its limitations when enlarged, or no picture at all. It is also a good idea to disallow shooting when AF detects that the subject is out of focus, since it is better to take home a few well-focused images than a lot of out-of-focus ones. It contains 6 optical elements in 5 groups, adds 22 mm to the length of a lens and weighs g. As you zoom in and out at the widest aperture, you can see the aperture changing in one-tenth increments. This is second mainstream tele lens that in pair with ZD 2. Therefore, there is little sense in comparing lens performance at significantly lower focal lengths.

Latest in-depth reviews

This lens olympua a ''constant'' lens, in that as you increase olympus 50 200mm weight loss focal length, the maximum aperture size decreases. In well lit conditions the Panasonic compares pretty well, particularly up to mm. This does not mean that the E-M1 is trash: years ago, photographers were very happy with their top-of-the-line DSLRs, and E-M1 users can now get a similar AF performance and a better image quality in a much cheaper, smaller and lighter camera.

Used Olympus e-m1 mark ii camera shutter count. Zuiko Digital lenses allow light to strike the image losa at a near-perpendicular angle, minimizing degradation and light loss. Single AF is not for me. The SWD version has been repeatedly praised in reviews for its excellent image quality and build quality. Quote: Does this lens have manual aperture control? It is extremely well built.

As a bonus, it's a great macro lens. Popular compact cameras ». The Olympus might or might not be 200m slightly better. Teleconverters work by magnifying the central portion of the image circle, and therefore they also magnify all the aberrations of the lens. The E-M1 is one of the most highly configurable cameras available today, and several other settings affect AF performance. Image quality with the EC and at effective focal length of 70 mm is nothing short of excellent Figure 5.

You may also like

When shooting hand-held, Normal or High should reduce the olympus 50 200mm weight loss of unintentional camera movements. Tried the SWD version. Best cameras for Instagram in A nice touch of the lens shade is a sliding door facing upwards in Figure 2but normally mounted facing downwards to rotate a polarizer without removing the lens shade. Distortion There are some points of distortion for this lens, but nothing so severe that it would even warrant correction in post-processing: in a nutshell, there is some barrel distortion evident below 70mm, and some pincushion above 70mm.

Although a lot of people only upload images to Instagram from their smartphones, the app is much more than just a mobile photography platform. Phocal God Subscribing Member. Photography Competitions. The EC in principle can be left on the when zooming to shorter focal lengths without noticeable image deterioration.

ALSO READ: Concerta Vs Adderall For Weight Loss

Mounted 200mm weight the E, the camera balance is very top-heavy; this is not a lens intended for one-handed use. The front filter doesn't turn while focussing or zooming, and just over a quarter turn on the zoom dial covers the entire focal range. Best cameras for travel in The results may be affected by slight focusing differences. Denjw's gear list: Denjw's gear list. Setting it apart from less expensive Olympus lenses is a distance scale.

  • I try to keep also these bursts short, because AF is always less reliable during burst shooting. They are not listed when the E-M1 displays the camera, lens and accessory firmware versions.

  • The number of shots per second in slow burst mode affects AF performance.

  • On the other hand, a teleconverter may enlarge the image circle of olympus 50 200mm weight loss lens beyond its original diameter, and cause light to spill onto other parts of the camera interior, potentially causing reflections, flare and loss of contrast. Directory Pages Search for all the latest photography gear and services in our dedicated photography directories.

  • If the subject is moving, only the olympus 50 200mm weight loss two-three shots have a loes of success, and there is no point in shooting a longer sequence. To see the sample shots from this lens captured with this lens on our test body, just click on either of the thumbnails below, and scroll as needed in the window that appears.

  • Great image quality, sharp with good contrast. The mm does hunt a little on the E-M1 if the background is busy or bright.

I've seen looss of these lenses going pretty cheap, which would give me a good idea if I like the FL or not, as down the track I might be interested in the new PL The test was done indoors to avoid wind problems. At olympus 50 200mm weight loss a third to half of the Pro price and unless you need the highest fps drive speeds and CAF performance, it is a good one to consider. With birds on the ground, Low or Normal may be suitable. Thanks to all your replies, I finally bought a LN- copy at a really good price. I hope that the new version of the E1 contains some form of sensor stabilization to help to realize the full potential of this lens. Roderick Balle wrote: How would this lens go on a Panasonic body, such as a G85?

Great image quality, sharp with good contrast. The same areas remain highlighted by focus peaking even when focus visibly changes at maximum viewfinder magnification. For this review, the lens was tested on an Olympus E3 using Imatest. Great for pre-focus on fast moving targets.

Ratings and Reviews

At around a third to half of the Pro price and unless you need the highest fps drive speeds and CAF performance, it is a good one to consider. I would recommend it to anybody who wants high quality telephoto image. Bob wrote: The is a faster, higher quality lens that shows virtually no degrading with the EC AF performance is also affected by image stabilization IS.

One of these is C-AF Lock. It's not a subtle noise, but it's a small price to pay for excellent autofocussing performance. In this case, I decided to compare the following lenses and settings: at mm, against Panasonic at mm. The same areas remain highlighted by focus peaking even when focus visibly changes at maximum viewfinder magnification. They changed the aperture blades for a bit better bokeh, or so that is the claim.

ALSO READ: Weight Loss Blog

I've actually thought about getting a second one to keep olympus 50 200mm weight loss a back up, as mine has a lot of mileage on it. This might not sound like much but, honestly, it makes a difference. The E-M1 allows a combination of single or continuous autofocus, with or without tracking. One of these is C-AF Lock. The Panasonic often struggles with AF, especially in overcast weather. Very nice lens, but large and somewhat awkward to handle.

I shot a lot of dance on stage this Christmas season with both lenses and the F2. Wight than that? Login Register. In this case, I decided to compare the following lenses and settings:. Mike Fewster. The lens takes 67mm filters, and comes with several accessories: a bowl-style lens hood, a lens carrying case and a lens-collar tripod mount.

Olympus 50-200mm f/2.8-3.5 Zuiko Digital User Reviews

The first has an ordinary AF motor and a completely black barrel no silver-and-blue ring deight the front. The bokeh and depth of field make art shots so much fun with this lens. Provided by clustrmaps. Zuiko Digital lenses allow light to strike the image sensor at a near-perpendicular angle, minimizing degradation and light loss.

This is a high-performance super-telescopic zoom lens that features, for the first time, the Supersonic Wave Drive SWD autofocus system which enables the lens to achieve an AF speed about two times faster3 than the previous ED mm f2. The question is whether it is worth getting this when I already have Oly ii. Latest posts. By using our service, you agree to our use of cookies.

ALSO READ: Adipex Weight Loss Pics Of 40

Search for all the latest photography gear and services in our dedicated photography directories. Olympus 50 200mm weight loss ones I have seen so far have only thin aluminium alloy eyelets machined out of the same material as the plate, which I do not really trust. I it's quite a big difference and the IQ seems to be mostly the same, so is the SWD version worth getting for the AF speed and loss of half the focal range under f 3. You may also like. The following table reflects the change as you zoom:. There are likewise no focus range limiter and no AF-lock button. It's worth noting that the zoom ring doesn't cover the focal range in a linear fashion; there's a lot of travel between 50mm and 70mm, over an inch of ring movement, but the distance between major focal lengths decreases rapidly as you go higher.

My is not bad but clearly the weakest among my collection. I am a weight loss photographer, and rely on this in many settings from weddings to sports. It's not a subtle noise, but it's a small price to pay for excellent autofocussing performance. If you have an EM5iii and EM1ii. Thank you for the replies. I'm looking forward to the Oly to replace the Sigma and will continue to use the Oly "Big Gun" on special occasions.

Olympus 50-200mm f/2.8-3.5 ED SWD Zuiko Digital User Reviews

Reading mode: Light Dark. Sigma fp L initial review. Equivalence and diffraction-free since

Cheers, Rick -- hide signature The focus ring does not turn during AF. No problems with distortions. Glass has no fungus, no scratch. AF with tracking is a hit-or-miss affair. A slower rate gives more time for AF to re-lock on the subject between shots.

To see the sample shots weight loss this lens captured with this lens on our test body, just click on either of the thumbnails below, and scroll as needed 5 the window that appears. AF with tracking is a hit-or-miss affair. I am a professional photographer, and rely on this in many settings from weddings to sports. Great for pre-focus on fast moving targets. Bokeh has been criticized by other users as being poor with "busy" backgrounds just out of focus. With plenty of light, a solid tripod, a subject that does not move and accurate manual focusing, the Panasonic would produce images as good as the with EC

4/3 lens system

As in, I never worry about stopping down sharp. I prefer a simpler classification into professional-grade, designed to satisfy the needs of professional users and weighr amateurs, and consumer grade, which in some cases may be good enough to be used by pros but are not built to be treated like a professional lens i. The Panasonic often struggles with AF, especially in overcast weather. Sample Photos! With birds among swaying branches or tall grasses, my best bet is High if AF is at all possible in these conditions.

Together with the general difficulty of seeing exactly what is in focus despite using maximum viewfinder magnification and focus peakingthe required rotation of the focus ring is sub-millimeter sized. The following table reflects the olympuw as you zoom:. I want the camera to keep the subject in focus while I follow it for up to a few seconds with the shutter half-pressed, until it is in the right position and doing the right thing. Shading ''Vignetting'' The mm has excellent performance with regard to vignetting. In this case, by choosing the I think I chose the chicken today. I did not see any difference when it was all said and done between the lenses in use.

ALSO READ: Aloe Vera Pills And Weight Loss Reviews

Phocal God Subscribing Member. I had one and I loved it, but I don't miss it. Lens Review Specifications. Thoughts on Olympus zoom lens grouping. The samples I have seen see also here are not decisive.

The olympus 50 200mm weight loss rendition is very good in my subjective opinion, and I saw no significant flare even in high-contrast, back-lit situations where direct sunlight hits the front element of the lens. The lens mount is metal, compared to the plastic of less expensive Olympus glass. Like all Zuiko Digital Lenses, the barrel and all connections are designed using all-metal components and rubber seals make it highly resistant to dust and moisture. Joined Jan 3, Messages 6, Location Mars. The PRO, is a fine lens, but with less reach than

Tried the SWD version. I olympus 50 200mm weight loss felt hampered or crippled by weiyht of these three lenses, as long as I was using them appropriately for their range and brightness levels. Got some great shots at an air display recently. This combination works very well in practical use. Major sporting venues in Aust impose a mm focal length restriction and the maximises my reach potential but if I didn't own it I wouldn't buy it for that alone I once took my f2.

Latest sample galleries

Additional AF settings The E-M1 is one of the most highly configurable cameras available today, and several other settings affect AF performance. The Olympus mm lives up to its reputation for excellent optical quality and I think it is well worth the extra weight. Remember me. Bokeh has been criticized by other users as being poor with "busy" backgrounds just out of focus. These figures just correspond to the focal lengths marked on the lens; in actual usage, the widest aperture adjusts quite precisely in conjunction with the focal length setting.

The viewfinder and image metadata display loss surgery effective aperture and effective focal length with the teleconverter looss not the nominal aperture and focal length. Tracking often loses its target and follows the wrong thing, especially on "busy" backgrounds. Used Olympus e-m1 mark ii camera shutter count. Most likely, this also true of the E-M10 and all "lower" Olympus camera models. The front extends forward quite a bit when zoomed, and makes the lens front-heavy. The icon for [Burst] is multiple overlapping rectangles.

ALSO READ: Hormone Balance Weight Loss Solutions

200mm appropriate setting depends on the type of subject and its movements. They may also add aberrations of their own, as well as flare and loss of contrast. Rich Z. A lens in this class is easy to use hand-held in good light. Three of the elements are made from ED glass. Removing the EC increases the lens speed by one stop and seems to make AF more reliable. I find a constant lens length in sports use a real boon as I have to fight the lens much less over the course of a long day.

They may also add aberrations of their own, as well losss flare and loss of contrast. For instance, it would allow the to remain hanging from the photographer's neck while temporarily switching to a shorter lens, without forcing the photographer to stow away the in a backpack. A lens in this class is easy to use hand-held in good light. If you have an EM5iii and EM1ii. Very nice lens, but large and somewhat awkward to handle.

Latest sample galleries

200jm Review Weight loss. Several reviews also comment on AF with this lens being fast on the Olympus E-M1 once the proper settings are used. I leave it on all the time. In consumer-grade zooms, image quality usually degrades across the whole frame at the longer focal lengths, and when the aperture is fully open.

  • By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.

  • I never felt hampered or crippled by any of these three lenses, as long as I was using them appropriately for their range and brightness levels.

  • With plenty of light, a solid tripod, a subject that does not move and accurate manual focusing, the Panasonic would produce images as good as the with EC

  • The lens shade is quite large, since it is designed for a focal length of 50 mm.

I it's quite a big difference and the IQ seems olympus 50 200mm weight loss be losss the same, so is the SWD version worth getting for the AF speed and loss of half the focal range under f 3. For example, there's only about a quarter-inch of ring movement between mm and mm. AF performance is also affected by image stabilization IS. Jun 15, RAH. Manually turning the focus ring of the is less precise than the focus-by-wire of the Panasonicbecause precision focusing with the latter requires a greater rotation of the focusing ring. Jun 23, melanieylang.

The E-M1 allows a combination of single or continuous autofocus, with weight loss without tracking. But, I could have both. I have no idea when it was released some time in '13? I would recommend it to anybody who wants high quality telephoto image. Mike Fewster. Cheers, Rick -- hide signature If you see any ads here, they are added by your ISP, or by spyware on your computer, or you are visiting this site through frames of another site.

The best camera bargains of Its worst point seems to olympus 50 200mm weight loss about 0. What remains to be examined are the general handling, image quality and AF performance of this lens when used on the E-M1, and the optimal settings of the E-M1 to get the best from this lens. Opinions vary on the mechanical strength and reliability of the different versions.

  • The first has an ordinary AF motor and a completely black barrel no silver-and-blue ring near the front.

  • I like the zoom range better, too.

  • E-M1 Mark II complete customization tips.

  • This is second mainstream tele lens that in pair with ZD 2. I use the non-SWD version and have no issues with any sort of "creep" using a sling.

I can zoom with my legs through the 10 mm gap of focal lengths between the two lenses. I got my mm 2. Low light, close to medium range : For sure F2 or bright primes 75 1. They BOTH performed awesomely.

It's worth noting that the zoom ring doesn't cover the focal range in a linear fashion; there's a lot of travel between 50mm and 70mm, over an inch of 200jm movement, but the distance between major focal lengths decreases rapidly as you go higher. It isn't in exactly the same category as the mm, but if you were willing to compromise on the focal length and aperture differences, it would probably end up being an excellent choice. Combine this with the alternatives of single shot, slow burst or fast burst, and you have 12 possible combinations. Although the lens does change in length when zoomed all the way out, but it isn't much of a big problem considering that the effective focal length is really mm. Other than that? The Olympus EC is a 1. Reading mode: Light Dark.

4/3 to Micro 4/3 adapter

This is a great lens to add to your Zuiko collection. It is useful in good daylight; but, when light isn't ideal, the gets mounted. The front filter doesn't turn while focussing or zooming, and just over a quarter turn on the zoom dial covers the entire focal range.

As for theI have the mk2 version and I am very happy with it. Good travel cameras should be small, versatile, and offer good image quality. Olympus Zuiko M. It is a good weight, but fast at f2. Threaded view.

With plenty of light, a solid tripod, a subject that does not move and accurate olympus 50 200mm weight loss focusing, the Panasonic would produce images as good as the with EC In conclusion, my favorite combination of shooting loympus is: Continuous AF without tracking Correct focus has priority over shooting Slow burst mode, 3 fps 3 by 3 array of large AF areas and the second-best: Continuous AF without tracking Correct focus has priority over shooting Slow burst mode, 3 fps 1 large AF area I have the first of these settings programmed in MySet 1 and assigned to the A position of the mode dial. When this lens arrived and I unpacked it, I was really surprised at how heavy and long it was. I am not concerned with AF speed but IQ is important.

USED Rating

Maximum focal length. I had loas and I loved it, but I don't miss it. A slower rate gives olympus 50 200mm weight loss time for AF to re-lock on the subject between shots. The VFA target should give you a good idea of sharpness in the center and corners, as well as some idea of the extent of barrel or pincushion distortion and chromatic aberration, while the Still Life subject may help in judging contrast and color.

Search Advanced search…. It's a big beefy thing, but handles beautifully on the E1. I lows recommend it to anybody who wants high quality telephoto image. I might be tempted to quickly zoom back to mm effective instead of removing the teleconverter. Cheers, Rick -- hide signature I can safely assume that the image quality of the coming Olympus and Panasonic professional-grade lenses will be exceptionally good. Similar threads K.

ALSO READ: Weight Loss Gel For Horses

The front extends forward quite a bit when zoomed, and makes the lens front-heavy. Weigyt the first Olympus and Panasonic versions are generally regarded as weight loss made, opinions on subsequent versions are often less flattering. The other values Low, Normal, High make the camera wait before trying to reacquire focus. Replies 42 Views 3K. Beautifully engineered. I also have to replace the lens cap with a pinch type to work with the hood. Given the price for used ones, I think it's hard to beat.

Contrast of the and EC remains better than the Panasonic I know it's ultimately not cheap but I ended up buying the PL to cover the long end. In any case, with IS active, the maximum fps in slow burst is 3. The subject was placed at a distance of about 6 m, which is reasonable for small bird photography with these lenses. Panasonic Leica DG mm F1. The E-M1 reports this teleconverter as an accessory, and its firmware as version 1.

Sidebar1?
Sidebar2?